# LinuxCNC vs plain-app

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | plain-app |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 7 085 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +325 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v3.3.25 · 11 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

plain-app scores 69/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.

plain-app ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.

If you want the quickest setup, plain-app is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

plain-app is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [plain-app](https://selfhost.directory/project/plain-app) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plain-app.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-plain-app