# LinuxCNC vs PhotoPrism

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | PhotoPrism |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 40 372 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +137 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-photoprism