# LinuxCNC vs Payload CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | Payload CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 45 571 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +639 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.

Payload CMS ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.

If you want the quickest setup, Payload CMS is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+639 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-payload-cms)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-payload-cms