# LinuxCNC vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LinuxCNC | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 512 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +35 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

LinuxCNC scores 64/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LinuxCNC](https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linuxcnc.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/linuxcnc-vs-openreader