L HarnessvsResourceSpace
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| L Harness | ResourceSpace | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 611 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | — |
Which one should you pick?
ResourceSpace scores 64/100 against 54/100 for L Harness, so it is the safer default.
L Harness ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, L Harness is easier to run; ResourceSpace needs more configuration.
L Harness details →ResourceSpace details →