# lila vs supabase-automated-self-host

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lila | supabase-automated-self-host |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Game Servers | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 18 912 ✓ | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

lila scores 76/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; lila needs more configuration.

lila is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lila](https://selfhost.directory/project/lila) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lila.md)
- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lila-vs-supabase-automated-self-host