# lila vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lila | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Game Servers | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 18 914 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Scala | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

lila scores 76/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; lila needs more configuration.

lila is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lila](https://selfhost.directory/project/lila) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lila.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lila-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana