# lila vs pwnflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lila | pwnflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Game Servers | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 18 918 ✓ | 281 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

lila scores 76/100 against 44/100 for pwnflow, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, pwnflow is easier to run; lila needs more configuration.

lila is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lila](https://selfhost.directory/project/lila) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lila.md)
- [pwnflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/pwnflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pwnflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lila-vs-pwnflow