# LightRAG vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LightRAG | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in RAG | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 40 393 ✓ | 16 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +558 ✓ | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.5.7 · 2 Sept 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

LightRAG scores 82/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for LightRAG.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; LightRAG needs more configuration.

LightRAG is growing faster right now (+558 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LightRAG](https://selfhost.directory/project/lightrag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lightrag.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lightrag-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap