# LightRAG vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LightRAG | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in RAG | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 40 406 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +561 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.7 · 2 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

LightRAG scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

LightRAG ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, LightRAG is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

LightRAG is growing faster right now (+561 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LightRAG](https://selfhost.directory/project/lightrag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lightrag.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lightrag-vs-zammad