# LightRAG vs youtube-dl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LightRAG | youtube-dl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in RAG | #6 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 40 403 ✓ | 402 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +558 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.7 · 2 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

LightRAG scores 82/100 against 51/100 for youtube-dl, so it is the safer default.

LightRAG ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for youtube-dl.

If you want the quickest setup, youtube-dl is easier to run; LightRAG needs more configuration.

LightRAG is growing faster right now (+558 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LightRAG](https://selfhost.directory/project/lightrag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lightrag.md)
- [youtube-dl](https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lightrag-vs-youtube-dl