LidarrvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lidarr | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 142 in Media Management | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 788 | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0.5144 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Lidarr, so it is the safer default.
Lidarr ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, Lidarr is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Lidarr details →Zabbix details →