# Lidarr vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lidarr | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 5 788 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0.5144 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Lidarr scores 72/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

Lidarr ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Lidarr needs more configuration.

Lidarr is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lidarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-vs-wbo