# Lidarr vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lidarr | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 787 | 17 187 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0.5144 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Lidarr scores 72/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

Lidarr ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Lidarr needs more configuration.

Lidarr is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lidarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-vs-upptime