# Lidarr vs Syslog-ng

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lidarr | Syslog-ng |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 5 787 ✓ | 2 386 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0.5144 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Lidarr scores 72/100 against 66/100 for Syslog-ng, so it is the safer default.

Lidarr ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.

Lidarr is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lidarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr.md)
- [Syslog-ng](https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-vs-syslog-ng