# Lidarr vs lidarr-on-steroids

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lidarr | lidarr-on-steroids |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 142 in Media Management | #21 of 31 in Music |
| GitHub stars | 5 783 ✓ | 529 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0.5144 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | C | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Lidarr scores 72/100 against 46/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.

Lidarr ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.

Lidarr is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lidarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr.md)
- [lidarr-on-steroids](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-vs-lidarr-on-steroids