lidarr-on-steroidsvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| lidarr-on-steroids | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 31 in Music | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 46/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; lidarr-on-steroids needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
lidarr-on-steroids details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep lidarr-on-steroids, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with