# lidarr-on-steroids vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lidarr-on-steroids | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 31 in Music | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 14 667 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 46/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; lidarr-on-steroids needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lidarr-on-steroids](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-on-steroids-vs-radarr