# lidarr-on-steroids vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lidarr-on-steroids | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 31 in Music | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 393 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 930 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 46/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 930 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lidarr-on-steroids](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-on-steroids-vs-openclaw