lidarr-on-steroidsvsOmniTools
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| lidarr-on-steroids | OmniTools | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 31 in Music | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 10 491 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +248 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 71/100 against 47/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.
OmniTools ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; lidarr-on-steroids needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).
lidarr-on-steroids details →OmniTools details →
Swap a project
Keep lidarr-on-steroids, compare it with
Keep OmniTools, compare it with