lidarr-on-steroidsvsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| lidarr-on-steroids | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 31 in Music | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 24 411 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +653 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 46/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.
Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; lidarr-on-steroids needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+653 stars in 30 days).
lidarr-on-steroids details →Navidrome Music Server details →
Swap a project
Keep lidarr-on-steroids, compare it with
Keep Navidrome Music Server, compare it with