lidarr-on-steroidsvsMeTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| lidarr-on-steroids | MeTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 31 in Music | #4 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 15 124 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 48 |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MeTube scores 76/100 against 46/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.
MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.
If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; lidarr-on-steroids needs more configuration.
MeTube is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
lidarr-on-steroids details →MeTube details →
Swap a project
Keep lidarr-on-steroids, compare it with
Keep MeTube, compare it with