# lidarr-on-steroids vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lidarr-on-steroids | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 31 in Music | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 20 537 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 47/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; lidarr-on-steroids needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lidarr-on-steroids](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-on-steroids-vs-mediamtx