lidarr-on-steroidsvsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| lidarr-on-steroids | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 31 in Music | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 50 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 38 |
| Latest release | — | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 47/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.
If you want the quickest setup, lidarr-on-steroids is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
lidarr-on-steroids details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep lidarr-on-steroids, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with