# lidarr-on-steroids vs livekit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lidarr-on-steroids | livekit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 31 in Music | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 21 897 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +822 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 47/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.

If you want the quickest setup, lidarr-on-steroids is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+822 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lidarr-on-steroids](https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lidarr-on-steroids.md)
- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lidarr-on-steroids-vs-livekit