# librephotos vs Nightingale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | librephotos | Nightingale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Photo Management | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 8 118 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 1.5.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

librephotos scores 71/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.

librephotos ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Nightingale.

If you want the quickest setup, librephotos is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.

librephotos is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [librephotos](https://selfhost.directory/project/librephotos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/librephotos.md)
- [Nightingale](https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/librephotos-vs-nightingale