# LibreChat vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LibreChat | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 46 432 ✓ | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 624 ✓ | +232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.8 · 1 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

LibreChat scores 85/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for LibreChat.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; LibreChat needs more configuration.

LibreChat is growing faster right now (+1 624 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LibreChat](https://selfhost.directory/project/librechat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/librechat.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

## Related comparisons

- [LibreChat vs openhands](https://selfhost.directory/compare/librechat-vs-openhands)
- [LibreChat vs NextChat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/librechat-vs-nextchat)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/librechat-vs-pulse