# librarr vs tubesync

> Two self-hosted [Sonarr alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/sonarr), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | librarr | tubesync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 60/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 12 in Book Management | #24 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 295 | 2 809 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 21 Sept 2026 | v0.18.5 · 8 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

tubesync scores 60/100 against 50/100 for librarr, so it is the safer default.

librarr ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for tubesync.

If you want the quickest setup, tubesync is easier to run; librarr needs more configuration.

tubesync is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [librarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/librarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/librarr.md)
- [tubesync](https://selfhost.directory/project/tubesync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tubesync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/librarr-vs-tubesync