# librarr vs livekit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | librarr | livekit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 295 | 21 899 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +824 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 21 Sept 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 50/100 for librarr, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for librarr.

If you want the quickest setup, librarr is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

livekit is growing faster right now (+824 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [librarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/librarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/librarr.md)
- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/librarr-vs-livekit