librarrvslivekit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| librarr | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 295 | 21 895 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +820 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 21 Sept 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 50/100 for librarr, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for librarr.
If you want the quickest setup, librarr is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+820 stars in 30 days).
librarr details →livekit details →
Swap a project
Keep librarr, compare it with
Keep livekit, compare it with