# Libation vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Libation | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 6 376 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/libation-vs-zammad