# Libation vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Libation | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 373 | 117 655 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +5 296 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/libation-vs-tradingagents