# Libation vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Libation | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Libation scores 68/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.

Libation is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/libation-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana