# Libation vs recyclarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Libation | recyclarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 376 ✓ | 2 146 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

Libation scores 68/100 against 64/100 for recyclarr, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for recyclarr.

If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.

Libation is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)
- [recyclarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/libation-vs-recyclarr