LibationvsRadarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | Radarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 373 | 14 667 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 19 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
Radarr scores 78/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Radarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation details →Radarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep Radarr, compare it with