LibationvsPanWatch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | PanWatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 2 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 | +118 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 12 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for PanWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation details →PanWatch details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep PanWatch, compare it with