LibationvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 10 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with