LibationvsOpenWA
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | OpenWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 373 | 16 334 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +328 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 3 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWA scores 77/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
OpenWA is growing faster right now (+328 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →OpenWA details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep OpenWA, compare it with