LibationvsOpenList
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | OpenList | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 373 | 25 320 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +562 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 15 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenList scores 80/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for OpenList.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
OpenList is growing faster right now (+562 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →OpenList details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep OpenList, compare it with