# Libation vs Opencast

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Libation | Opencast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #37 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 ✓ | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | 19.10 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Libation scores 68/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Opencast.

If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.

Libation is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)
- [Opencast](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/libation-vs-opencast