LibationvsOpenBrief
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | OpenBrief | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 580 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 1 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →OpenBrief details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep OpenBrief, compare it with