LibationvsOmniRoute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | OmniRoute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 82 212 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +3 196 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 10 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 196 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →OmniRoute details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with