# Libation vs octelium

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Libation | octelium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #22 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 6 376 ✓ | 4 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Libation scores 68/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for octelium.

If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

Libation is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)
- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/libation-vs-octelium