LibationvsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 17 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 19 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Nomad.
Libation is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →Nomad details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep Nomad, compare it with