LibationvsmotionEye
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | motionEye | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 6 376 | 4 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 6 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.
If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →motionEye details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep motionEye, compare it with