# Libation vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Libation | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 376 | 46 471 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +1 327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/libation-vs-mitmproxy