# LetterFeed vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LetterFeed | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 207 | 132 722 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 267 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1467 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.5.3 · 8 Sept 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 41/100 for LetterFeed, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for LetterFeed.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LetterFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/letterfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/letterfeed.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/letterfeed-vs-llamacpp