# LetoReader vs Open-WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LetoReader | Open-WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Productivity | #3 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 316 | 157 080 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +4 135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.12.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | HTML | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Open-WebUI scores 90/100 against 47/100 for LetoReader, so it is the safer default.

Open-WebUI ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for LetoReader.

If you want the quickest setup, LetoReader is easier to run; Open-WebUI needs more configuration.

Open-WebUI is growing faster right now (+4 135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LetoReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/letoreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/letoreader.md)
- [Open-WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/letoreader-vs-open-webui