LemmyvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lemmy | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 653 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.19.21 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Lemmy scores 75/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lemmy.
If you want the quickest setup, Lemmy is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Lemmy is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
Lemmy details →TypeType details →