# laudspeaker vs plunk

> Two self-hosted [Customer.io alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/customerio), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | laudspeaker | plunk |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Engagement | #9 of 106 in Email |
| GitHub stars | 2 630 | 5 555 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +73 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.17.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

plunk scores 68/100 against 48/100 for laudspeaker, so it is the safer default.

plunk ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for laudspeaker.

If you want the quickest setup, plunk is easier to run; laudspeaker needs more configuration.

plunk is growing faster right now (+73 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [laudspeaker](https://selfhost.directory/project/laudspeaker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/laudspeaker.md)
- [plunk](https://selfhost.directory/project/plunk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plunk.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/laudspeaker-vs-plunk